Skip to main content

Only one in 10 feel safer on Smart Motorways when compared to traditional motorway – AA

Only one in 10 feel safer on Smart Motorways when compared to traditional motorway – AA

Only one in 10 drivers (10%1) say they feel safer on All Lane Running Smart (ALR) Motorway schemes compared to a traditional motorway according to a study by the AA. 

The survey of more than 15,000 drivers found that seven out of 10 (71%) believed that ALR schemes felt more dangerous than a motorway with a permanent hard shoulder with around half (48%) saying they strongly believed they felt more dangerous. 

There was also a fall in trust for the existing distances between Emergency Refuge Areas (ERA). In February 2016, almost a quarter (23%2) felt that 1.5 miles was a suitable distance between ERAs, but this has now fallen to 16%. 

From April 2020, all new schemes will have ERA spaced at every mile, but only two fifths (41%) believe this is a suitable distance. Almost two thirds (63%) believe ERAs should be spaced every half a mile. Drivers’ acceptance of these distances have changed considerably since 2016: 

AA Populus Driver Poll, acceptance of ERA distances

Distance between ERA

February 2016

September 2019

% Difference

1.5 miles (2.5 km)




1.0 miles (1.5 km)




0.5 miles (1.0 km)





Following five deaths along the same stretch of the M1, more than half (52%) of drivers believe the rollout of ALR schemes should be stopped. On Friday, the Coroner for West Midlands advised they were going to raise concerns to Highways England following the death of 8-year old Dev Naran3

The news comes as the new Secretary of State for Transport, Grant Shapps, gives evidence before the Transport Select Committee today (16 October) to outline his priorities for the role4

Edmund King, AA president says; “We believe the Secretary of State should now announce a review into the safety of All Lane Running Schemes. 

“Unfortunately we have already seen fatalities where vehicles have been left in vulnerable positions in live lanes. Previous research has shown that if Stopped Vehicle Detection is not in place it takes an average of 17 minutes to spot a stationary vehicle in a live lane5

“Our new study shows that public trust on removing the hard shoulder has pretty much evaporated. Before any further schemes begin, we need an urgent and independent review into the safety of existing schemes.”

A Highways England spokesperson responded:

 “Evidence indicates that motorways without hard shoulders are helping to improve safety with casualty rates falling by more than 25 per cent. Independent research from watchdog Transport Focus shows that a clear majority of drivers, more than 90%, do feel confident driving on motorways.

 Smart motorways include more features than conventional motorways to further enhance safety, and both are significantly safer for drivers than other roads

 We will, of course, continue to monitor the safety performance of smart motorways – as we do with all of our roads - and are rolling out enhancements to improve the road user experience further.

 These include reducing the distance between places to stop in an emergency on smart motorways, such as emergency areas, motorway service areas and hard shoulders on junction slip roads, to one mile apart. They are currently 1.5 miles apart – on average every 75 seconds at 60mph. We’re also making them more visible – we’ve already made more than 140 more visible by turning them orange and improving signage.”

*Article Source

Hi, I am Alphie. How can I help you?